I was given a copy of the ESV Study Bible for Christmas which I’m enjoying reading. It has lots of articles and study notes and maps and introductions and references and .. oh yeah, the Bible.
The producers also give you access to the full text online. It is interesting to compare the two. I’ve never owned a laptop, so using the online version invovles going to a corner of the lounge room, whereas I can take the book anywhere.
The online version is helpful when you want to check out some of the many references, because you only have to hover over the reference and the text pops up. With the book, this would involve a lot of page turning.
I’ve also been comparing the online version of New Grove, 2nd edition and the print version. Grove is the musician’s bible. It was begun by Sir George Grove in 1878 and had a mere 4 volumes. The latest version has grown to 29 volumes, 21 million words and 29,000 articles.
In 2007, when I got the chance to show the whole of Australia what a goose I am on The Einstein Factor, I subscribed for 3 months. It is expensive and costs 50 pounds for a quarter. I used this to bone up on Bach, my subject on the program. I had a copy of the first edition of New Grove [a mere 20 volumes], but did not have access to the latest edition, which is why I subscribed to the online up-to-date version.
I was a bit annoyed when I discovered that the 2001 edition is extremely similar to the 1980 edition in the article on JSB. [A bit like the ESV and the RSV ...]
But my friend who kindly gave me an imperfect copy of New Grove [worth $2000 new], has now kindly given me a brand new copy of the $7000 latest edition. Each volume is worth about $240! [He worked for the publishers.]
As I work my way around this set of books, I think that someone familiar with the books would get more out of the online version. The online version can save a lot of time when you need to go from volume to volume. But there is value in knowing, however roughly, the structure of the physical set. And it is still easier to read the books than to read from a computer screen.
This makes me think about the many folk [which includes me] who have lots of online commentaries and dictionaries but have never actually held the original books. I think we would also greatly benefit from also owning the print copies, or at least being familiar with them.
If only we had the shelf space.